The US is doing Israel’s bidding with strikes on Iran that are unlikely to trigger regime change, Michael Maloof has told RT
The US-Israeli strikes on Iran are unlikely to trigger regime change and risk escalating into a wider geopolitical confrontation, former Pentagon security policy analyst Michael Maloof has told RT.
Washington and West Jerusalem launched what they described as a preemptive attack on the Islamic Republic after nuclear talks failed to produce a breakthrough, prompting retaliation from Iran. Tehran responded with missile and drone strikes targeting Israel and US military bases across the region.
In an interview with RT on Saturday, Maloof said the timing of the attack had likely been finalized during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Mar-a-Lago on February 12, despite President Donald Trump publicly insisting that negotiations with Tehran were ongoing.
The United States has always done Israel’s bidding. Netanyahu basically controls Trump, Maloof claimed, adding that the US president has effectively pursued the Israeli PM’s vision of a greater Israel to encompass all the Arab countries.
Trump openly declared his goal to force regime change in Tehran, but efforts to topple Iran’s government would face major obstacles, according to Maloof.
Regime change is something that is going to be difficult, especially in Iran, where they’re very, very set. They have a government in place, he said. Even with the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps would likely keep the country functioning as a cohesive nation-state.
Read more At the same time, he described the strikes as part of a broader strategic confrontation extending beyond Iran’s nuclear or missile programs, noting how the US president has been openly critical of BRICS and China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
And Iran just happened to be a very critical component to that, with Russia and with China, Maloof said. I think Trump bit off more than he could chew on this one.
These attacks are gonna affect the whole economic world order, literally overnight. So we’re in for a long, hard slug here, Maloof said, adding that it’s easy to start a war, but [it’s harder to know] how to stop one.
The US-Israeli strikes on Iran are unlikely to trigger regime change and risk escalating into a wider geopolitical confrontation, former Pentagon security policy analyst Michael Maloof has told RT.
Washington and West Jerusalem launched what they described as a preemptive attack on the Islamic Republic after nuclear talks failed to produce a breakthrough, prompting retaliation from Iran. Tehran responded with missile and drone strikes targeting Israel and US military bases across the region.
In an interview with RT on Saturday, Maloof said the timing of the attack had likely been finalized during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Mar-a-Lago on February 12, despite President Donald Trump publicly insisting that negotiations with Tehran were ongoing.
The United States has always done Israel’s bidding. Netanyahu basically controls Trump, Maloof claimed, adding that the US president has effectively pursued the Israeli PM’s vision of a greater Israel to encompass all the Arab countries.
Trump openly declared his goal to force regime change in Tehran, but efforts to topple Iran’s government would face major obstacles, according to Maloof.
Regime change is something that is going to be difficult, especially in Iran, where they’re very, very set. They have a government in place, he said. Even with the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps would likely keep the country functioning as a cohesive nation-state.
Read more At the same time, he described the strikes as part of a broader strategic confrontation extending beyond Iran’s nuclear or missile programs, noting how the US president has been openly critical of BRICS and China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
And Iran just happened to be a very critical component to that, with Russia and with China, Maloof said. I think Trump bit off more than he could chew on this one.
These attacks are gonna affect the whole economic world order, literally overnight. So we’re in for a long, hard slug here, Maloof said, adding that it’s easy to start a war, but [it’s harder to know] how to stop one.
